Working for logical immigation reform based on a stable population, a recognition of the finite nature of our natural resources and the adverse impact of continued growth on our quality of life, standard of living, national interest, character, language, sovereignty and the rule of law. Pushing back and countering the disloyal elements in American society and the anti-American rhetoric of the leftwing illegal alien lobbies. In a debate, when your opponents turn to name calling, it's a good sign you've already won.

Friday, February 3, 2017

Population Growth

People are taking to the streets to protest President Trump's immigration Executive Order.  One might well ask :  Who are these people?  First of all one can be certain that they are not loyal Americans because if they were they wouldn't be so eager to sacrifice our standard of living and quality of life by promoting excessive population growth through unfettered immigration .  We might also wonder why they would agitate in favor of  refugees who do not share our values?  What  do these agitators have in common with people who stone adulteresses on the flimsiest evidence, cut off the hands of thieves, order the murder of apostates and infidels?  Don't they even comprehend that they themselves are infidels?  Why is it no one explains to the world and to the refugees that it is these 13th Century practices inherent to Islam and the Koran that are abhorrent to us?

Europe used to be a center of great learning and culture.  Now by virtue of its own policies it is in danger of sliding back into the Dark Ages as Islam creeps across the land and beautiful Christian cathedrals are converted into Mosques where the preaching of sedition and anti-infidel rhetoric is a common occurrence.

Some are what is commonly known as bleeding heart liberals.  Few would argue with them that we need to address the needs of the economically vulnerable by remedying injustice, engaging in benevolence, fostering mutual aid, and encouraging the flourishing of free markets is both practically and morally important.  The disagreement arises with  regard  to how far one is obligated to go in sacrificing one's own economic and psychic well-being and whether it is proper to advocate measures which would fall heavily on those  who abhor confiscatory taxation and immigration policies which tend to take from those who have earned or possess it  in order to give it to those who have not or who envy the good-fortune those who live in better circumstances.

Most of this mindless rabble haven't even contemplated what would be the optimum U.S. and world populations.   Until they do they are like  reckless teenage drivers whose brains are  not fully developed.  Thee is evidence to support  the steady decline in our standard of living as our population continued to grow.  Is it the desire of these demonstrators to reduce our standard of living until it is in equilibrium with that elsewhere on the globe?   If they have not experienced the poverty, joblessness, disease , overcrowding, crime and oligarchies  first hand , they should be careful what they wish for.

We should be advocating for that optimum population level  that best serves our citizens and not be swayed by those foreigners and illegal aliens who would compromise our standard of living to accommodate millions of their brethren and others from cultures  and religious totally at odds with the basic concepts of American democracy

Friday, December 16, 2016

Putin Speaks???

Unfortunately, I understand this to be a hoax.  If only it were otherwise and all world leaders had the guts to say this in defense of their culture, language and nationalism.  Nationalists are often mistaken for xenophobes.  It is not that they are afraid of other cultures and languages.  It is that they prefer their own and wish to preserve them just as other cultures and languages of immigrants and illegal aliens are are well-preserved in their respective homelands. 
   
 Begin:   Hoax??
No wonder he was selected by Forbes as the most powerful person in the world. This is one time our elected leaders should pay attention to the advice of Vladimir Putin.

I would suggest that not only our leaders but every citizen of USA should pay attention to this advice. How scary is that?
It is a sad day when a Communist Leader makes more sense than our LEADERS here in the U.S.A., but here it is!
Vladimir Putin's speech - SHORTEST SPEECH EVER.
Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia:
 
"In Russia, live like Russians. Any minority, from anywhere, if it wants to live in Russia, to work and eat in Russia, it should speak Russian, and should respect the Russian laws. If they prefer Sharia Law, and live the life of Muslim's then we advise them to go to those places where that's the state law.
"Russia does not need Muslim minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell 'discrimination'. We will not tolerate disrespect of our Russian culture. We better learn from the suicides ofAmerica, England, Holland, and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Muslims are taking over those countries and they will not take over Russia. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of Sharia Law and Muslims.
"When this honorable legislative body thinks of creating new laws, it should have in mind the Russian national interest first, observing that the Muslims Minorities Are Not Russians."

The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a five minute standing ovation."
End of hoax
Keep this to yourself, you are part of the problem!


I do hope some of these questions get answered!! 

VERY INTERESTING! 


Truly – what will be in his presidential library????? 

THE UNANSWERED MYSTERY OF THE CENTURY!!! 

Well, he's ending 8 years of living in the White House 


This came from a union guy in Chicago who didn't vote for Obama.  Very interesting perspective that I never thought of in this light! 
-------------------
It will be interesting to see what they put in his "Library” about his early years when he is out of office. In a country where we take notice of many, many facets of our public figures' lives, doesn't it seem odd that there's so little we know about our current man in the WH, Barack Obama? For example, we know that Andrew Jackson's wife smoked a corn cob pipe and was accused of adultery; Abe Lincoln never went to school; Jack Kennedy wore a back brace; Harry Truman played the piano. As Americans, we enjoy knowing details about our newsmakers, but none of us know one single humanizing fact about the history of our own president. 

We are all aware of the lack of uncontestable birth records for Obama; that document managing has been spectacularly successful. 

There are however, several additional oddities in Obama's history that appear to be as well managed as the birthing issue. 

One other interesting thing...  There are no birth certificates of his daughters that can be found? It's interesting that no one who ever dated him has shown up.  The charisma that caused women to be drawn to him so strongly during his campaign, certainly would in the normal course of events, lead some lady to come forward, if only to garner some attention for herself.  We all know about JFK's magnetism, that McCain was no monk and quite a few details about  Palin's courtship and even her athletic prowess, Joe Biden's aneurisms are no secret;  look at Cheney and Clinton, we all  know about their heart  problems. Certainly Wild Bill Clinton's exploits before and during his White House years, were well known.  That's why it's so odd that not one lady has stepped up and said, "He was soooo shy..." or "What a great dancer..." 

It's virtually impossible to know anything about this fellow.  Who was the best man at his wedding?  Start there. Then check groomsmen. 

Then get the footage of the graduation ceremony.  Has anyone talked to the professors?  It is odd that no one is bragging that they knew him or taught him or lived with him. 

When did he meet Michele, and how?    Are there photos there? Every president gives to the public all their photos, etc. for their library, etc.    What has he released?  And who voted for him to be the most popular man in 2010?   Doesn't this make you wonder? 

Ever wonder why no one ever came forward from Obama's past saying they knew him, attended school with him, was his friend, etc.?? Not one person has ever come forward from his past. It certainly is very, very strange... 

This should be a cause for great concern.  To those who voted for him, you may have elected an unqualified, inexperienced shadow man.  Have you seen a movie named "The Manchurian Candidate?" 

As insignificant as each of us might be, someone with whom we went to school will remember our name or face; someone will remember we were the clown or the dork or the brain or the quiet one or the bully or something about us. 

George Stephanopoulos of ABC News said the same thing during the 2008 campaign.    He questions why no one has acknowledged the president was in their classroom or ate in the same cafeteria or made impromptu speeches on campus. Stephanopoulos also was a classmate of Obama at Columbia -- the class of 1984.  He says he never had a single class with him. 

He is such a great orator; why doesn't anyone in Obama's college class remember him? Why won't he allow Columbia to release his records? Nobody remembers Obama at Columbia University... 

Looking for evidence of Obama's past,    Fox News contacted 400 Columbia University students from the period when Obama claims to have been there... but none remembered him. Wayne Allyn Root was, like Obama, a political science major at Columbia who also graduated in 1983.    In 2008, Root says of Obama, "I don't know a single person at Columbia that knew him, and they all know me. I don't have a classmate who ever knew Barack Obama at Columbia, ever." 

Nobody recalls him. Root adds that he was also, like Obama, Class of '83 Political Science, and says, "You don't get more exact or closer than that. Never met him in my life, don't know anyone who ever met him.    At class reunion, our 20th reunion five years ago, who was asked to be the speaker of the class?  Me.  No one ever heard of Barack! And five years ago, nobody even knew who he was. The guy who writes the  class notes, who's kind of the, as we say in New York, 'the macha' who knows everybody, has yet  to find a person, a human who ever met  him." 

Obama's photograph does not appear in the school's yearbook and Obama consistently declines requests to talk about his years at Columbia, provide school records, or provide the name of any former classmates or friends while at Columbia. 

Some other interesting questions: Why was Obama's law license inactivated in 2002?  It is said there is no record of him ever taking the Bar exam. Why was Michelle's law license inactivated by court order?  We understand that was forced to avoid fraud charges. It is circulating that according to the U.S. Census, there is only one Barack Obama but 27 Social Security numbers and over 80 alias connected to him. 

The Social Security number he uses now originated in Connecticut where he is reported to have never lived.    And was originally registered to another man (Thomas Louis Wood) from Connecticut, who died in Hawaii while on vacation there. As we all know Social Security Numbers are only issued 'once, they are not reused’ No wonder all his records are sealed... 

Please continue sending this out.  Somewhere, someone has to know SOMETHING!?!... School? Before he reorganized Chicago? SOMETHING!!!  He just seemed to burst upon the Scene at the 2004 Democratic Convention.  ANYONE??? ANYWHERE??? ANYTHING??? 
______________________________ ______________________________ _


I think soon much is going to come to light about this highly unqualified person who has been president of the United States for 8 years.  Soon, we will know how badly we were all doped and duped by this imposter who has basically, with much help from his minions, brought the greatest nation in history to its knees in ruins. That will be his legacy.  He totally destroyed the Integrity, Morals and Christian Heritage of our once great country. Who in the hell is he? Is America stupid or what? 

Thursday, December 26, 2013

The American Tribe

Leading Evangelicals Show that Bible Has Been Misinterpreted


By James Robb, Tuesday, December 24, 2013, 9:08 AM EST - posted on NumbersUSA
  This is the time of year when many pro-amnesty advocates in the pulpit and the press misuse the Bible to try to try to advance their cause. This year, churchgoers are fortunate to have access to a much different explanation of scripture, thanks to the emergence of a group called Evangelicals for Biblical Immigration and to a fascinating panel recently sponsored by the Heritage Foundation to inform congressional staffers and the media.
Kelly Monroe Kullberg, who has organized Evangelicals for Biblical Immigration, is a highly respected evangelical leader. She founded the Veritas Forum at Harvard University in the 1990s, which has since grown into a world-wide movement. Her critique of the sloppy handling of Scripture used by some clergy is irenic yet wide-ranging. At the Heritage panel, she said:
God loves us all. God invites us all to be citizens in his kingdom. He places us in families, tribes and nations, and gives us biblical wisdom about shaping a thriving culture. Like gardening, growing a culture requires discernment and vision. But nowhere in Scripture do we see blanket asylum, blanket amnesty, blanket immigration. We see wise welcome to a well-meaning Ruth or Rahab (the sojourner or 'ger' in Hebrew is something like a convert and comes lawfully, as blessing), and we also at times find a Nehemiah leading his nation in the building of walls to cultivate the good and to be set apart from the ways of the 'foreigner' (the 'nekhar' or 'zar') who does not respect the laws, customs and values of the country visited -- who does not intend to advance cultural flourishing.
Mark Tooley, the president of Washington's Institute on Religion and Democracy (on whose board I serve), has been warning his fellow evangelical leaders against a one-sided approach on immigration. His remarks at the Heritage panel included this:
Christians also should be cautioned against sweeping 'comprehensive' legislative solutions to deep, pervasive political problems. Solutions to most political challenges are more typically incremental. And in our fallen world, reputed solutions, even when implemented relatively effectively, usually create new problems demanding attention. And in this particular debate we should avoid rhetoric that romanticizes immigrants no less than avoiding demonization.
Immigrants, legal and illegal, are frail humans like us all, a combination of virtues and vices. Their presence among us brings both gifts and troubles. Our prisons are full of tens of thousands of immigrants, legal and illegal, who have committed heinous crimes. There are also, of course, millions who work hard, are faithful to their families, and love their new country. Likewise, many immigrants, even while working hard, ultimately draw government benefits and services that outstrip their financial contributions, making their presence in America an additional fiscal stress upon our already fraying and probably unsustainable entitlement state. The mass legalization of 11 million illegal immigrants, as presently construed, would likely add to that stress.
Dr. James K. Hoffmeier, a professor at Trinity Evangelical Divinity School, is an expert in ancient Hebrew and ancient near-east society. He takes a dim view of current Evangelical leaders who misuse Scripture for political ends. At the Heritage panel, Hoffmeier made the following points (as reported by The Christian Post):
Three different Hebrew words are translated as "foreigner" or "sojourner," Hoffmeier explained, but the most common one, by far, is ger, which appears 160 times. Under biblical law, a ger was legally recognized and entitled to certain rights, responsibilities and social benefits. They could participate in community worship. They were expected to observe kosher dietary laws. And, they could not be charged interest.
"People who are using scripture for the undocumented immigrant are trying to credit the non-legal resident with the same rights the biblical law calls for a legal foreign resident," he said.
Hoffmeier strongly rebuked open borders evangelicals for misusing the "sanctuary cities" passages found in Scripture. He stated that in ancient Israel, sanctuary cities were places where accused criminals could flee to get a fair trial. In effect, they were a change of venue. "Sanctuary" never meant escaping the law, Hoffmeier said. He said that using the sanctuary cities concept to help illegal aliens cancel out immigration penalties is completely against the "spirit and letter" of the texts.
Another evangelical speaking up against misuse of Bible passages on immigration is Dr. Carol Swain, professor of political science and law at Vanderbilt Law School. At the Heritage Foundation event, Swain claimed that Evangelicals had been "manipulated" by pro-amnesty proponents who seek to overturn the law for political and economic advantage. Swain, who is black, spoke forcefully about the effect mass immigration has on minorities and white workers:
The losers tend to be low-skill, low-wage Americans. Our greatest obligation is to the people already here [legally].
Kullberg makes a strong case for a more reasoned, balanced approach on immigration than many Evangelical leaders have ever voiced:
We're for wise immigration. We're for kindness to citizens as well as kindness to guests. Immigration is a beautiful idea. As a younger missionary in several Central American nations, I never understood the need for rules and fences. The problem is that we're considering an influx of perhaps 30- or 40,000,000 new citizens in just ten years, into a near-bankrupt welfare state living on borrowed money -- America. There aren't enough jobs.
At the Heritage panel, Tooley of IRD made this remark that struck me as summing up the situation:
There are sincere people of faith on many sides of this debate. Quoting scripture and citing religious principles in support of a political argument can be fine if done with some humility and recognition that on most political issues none of us can claim to know God's will with absolute certainty.
JIM ROBB is Vice President, Operations for NumbersUSA 

Sunday, October 27, 2013

Democrats Doom Democracy

The less this interests you, and the younger you are,
the more important it is that you read it!

In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at
the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about
the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years
prior: "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it
simply cannot exist as a permanent form of
government. A democracy will continue to exist up
until the time that voters discover that they can
vote themselves generous gifts from the public
treasury. From that moment on, the majority always
votes for the [liberal, progressive, democrat] candidates  
who promise the most benefits from the public treasury,
with the result that every democracy will finally
 collapse over loose fiscal policy[like Obama's],
(which is) always followed bya dictatorship."

"The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of
history, has been about 200 years. During those
200 years, these nations always progressed through
the following sequence: From bondage to
spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great
courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty
to abundance; From abundance to complacency;
From complacency to apathy; From apathy to
dependence; From dependence back into bondage.

Illegal aliens know this better than anyone so they
come in droves, register and vote illegally, and the welfare
office their first stop after they have a  child born in the\
U.S. making the whole family eligible for public
housing and all manner of welfare benefits.




 
 

Wednesday, June 26, 2013

Traitors - Do you recognize any of these names?

The Republican Senators listed on the left below  have reneged on their promises  to vote against amnesty.  Some if not all have been bought off by Senate majority leadership with provisions in the amnesty bill that provide extra funds to the states of those GOP senators who agree to vote for the amnesty bill, S.744.

The Democrat Senators who have done likewise even though they are from "Red" States.
If you recognize the names of any of your senators, please call them to voice your extreme displeasure with their votes.  Ask them to reconsider and honor their promises.

This is another of those thousand page bills that obscure a variety of provisions that serve special interests rather than the American people.  It was largely written by representatives of La Raza, unions and the chamber of commerce.  Ordinary Americans and those with opposing view were not allowed to participate.  And don't be fooled by Senators McCain, Rubio, Flake and Graham's participation on the Gang of Eight.  They were the senators who least represented  their party's position.  No  other choice could have been worse.

It's difficult to see how this process in any way resembles the democratic process we expect from our government. 

 
 
Rubio                    Stabenow

Corker                  McCaskill

Wicker                 Donelly

Ayotte                  Hagan

Flake                     Landrieou

Hatch                   Tester

Heller                   Pryorf

Alexander

Colllins

McCain

Graham

Kirk

Murkowski

Chisea