Notorious GAng of Eight N Immigration Bill bodes ill for U.S. Population Growth -- Dee Perez-Scott Loves It!

33 million!!!!!

That's the number our analysts came up with after nearly two weeks deciphering the 844-page bill created by the "Senate Gang of Eight" to give amnesty to illegal aliens.

AMNESTY IS THE TROJAN HORSE .............................. FILLED WITH FAR WORSE DANGERS

Unbelievably, the 11 million illegal aliens to be given work permits are merely the visible Trojan Horse. As bad as that amnesty is, it is distracting the nation from the fact that inside the bill is something far worse than the amnesty -- WORK PERMITS FOR 22 MILLION FOREIGN CITIZENS in addition to the 11 million illegal aliens!

11 million + 22 million = 33 million.

And the 33 million is just the first 10 years. It looks like the bill possibly could dole out around 20 million lifetime work permits every decade after that. We're still working on those numbers.

33 million is the number that should start every conversation about the "comprehensive immigration reform" bill being rushed through the Senate Judiciary Committee by Chairman Pat Leahy (D-Vermont).

And it's the number that has to stop this bill before it can do unalterable damage to our country. No matter what your Members of Congress may think about giving an amnesty to 11 million, they can't possibly justify immediately over the next decade adding 33 million more potential competitors for scarce U.S. jobs.

LIKE ADDING 20 LARGEST U.S. CITIES ............................ ALL OVER AGAIN

Our cities, suburbs, towns and rural areas already have 20 million Americans who want a full-time job but can't find one.

It is hard to imagine what adding another 33 million foreign citizens with work permits would look like.

But try this:

33 million is like adding an entire new city of New York, PLUS . . .

. . . adding duplicate cities of Los Angeles, Houston, Philadelphia, Phoenix and San Antonio, PLUS . . .

. . . also adding duplicate cities of San Diego, Dallas, San Jose, Jacksonville and Indianapolis, PLUS . . .

. . . finally adding duplicates of Austin, San Francisco, Columbus, Fort Worth, Charlotte, Detroit, El Paso, Memphis and Boston!!!!!!!!!!!!!

If Congress passes this bill it would be like re-creating ALL of the Top 20 cities in the United States, filling them entirely with foreign citizens and giving them lifetime work permits to compete with America's struggling workers -- and in just 10 years time.

Immigration Bill Doesn’t Secure the Border

James Carafano

April 29, 2013 at 7:39 am

(35)

Must Washington fix our broken southern border? You bet.

Will the comprehensive immigration reform bill help? You bet it won’t.

The number one flaw of the bill is it starts by giving amnesty to the unlawfully present population in the United States. As soon as the bill passes, those in the country contrary to U.S. immigration law are granted status to stay.

Amnesty immediately creates an incentive for illegal border crossings and overstays. Thus, the bill’s strategy would drive up the cost of securing the border. To make matters worse, the draft law states that anyone who was present in the U.S. before 2012 qualifies—creating massive opportunity for fraud, since there is no proof required that applicants have been here for several years.

While supporters of the bill trumpet its “border security” features, in reality, the law delivers nothing new—other than the promise of spending a lot more money and running up our debt.

The bill trashes fiscal discipline, exploiting “a loophole in the Budget Control Act (BCA) that allows Congress to spend more than allowed under the spending caps adopted in 2011.”

In other words, Washington is willing to draft a bounced check to justify an amnesty bill.

To make matters worse, there is very little likelihood that that Americans will get much for the next border security buck spent.

The Secretary of Homeland Security has repeatedly stated that our borders “have never been more secure.” In the past five years, the White House has never asked for this additional border security funding. Yet, this bill lavishes billions of additional spending on the department with no clear requirements on how the money is spent. At least $2 billion could legitimately be labeled the Secretary’s slush fund.

Supporters of the bill trumpet requirements to “certify” border security, yet its standards are in some ways weaker than existing law. Present law requires gaining “operational control” of the whole border, while this bill sets standards only for “high-risk” sectors. Since smuggling trails shift to where the security is not, even if the standards were attained in one area, the traffic would just go somewhere else.

In addition, the Department of Homeland Security has been trying unsuccessfully to define credible metrics for border security since 2004. Even if it had effective “triggers,” that does not guarantee a secure border. Border crossing conditions constantly change. Even if the goal is achieved, there is no guarantee it will stay that way.

We can do more to secure our borders. But we don’t need an amnesty bill and bogus border triggers to make our borders safe and sovereign. Nor does Washington need to throw more buckets of money toward border security.

Our government could cooperate more effectively with Mexico and the border states. Congress could modernize our legal immigrant and non-immigrant programs, including effective temporary worker programs. The government could enforce our workplace and immigration laws.

In short, the promise of border security in this case is merely an excuse for a bloated bill that would promise anything to push amnesty, regardless of cost or practicality.

Uncomfortable Facts

BUCHANAN TO OBAMA

By Patrick J.. Buchanan

Barack says we need to have a conversation

about race in America ..

Fair enough.

But this time,

it has to be a two-way conversation..

White America needs to be heard from,

not just lectured to....

This time,

the Silent Majority needs to have its convictions,

grievances and demands heard.

And among them are these:

First,

America has been the best country on earth for black folks.

It was here that 600,000 black people,

brought from Africa in slave ships,

grew into a community of 40 million,

were introduced to Christian salvation,

and reached the greatest levels

of freedom and prosperity blacks have ever known..

Jeremiah Wright ought to go down on his knees

and thank God he is an American.

Second,

no people anywhere has done more to lift up blacks

than white Americans.

Untold trillions have been spent since the '60s

on welfare, food stamps, rent supplements,

Section 8 housing, Pell grants, student loans,

legal services, Medicaid, Earned Income Tax Credits

and poverty programs designed

to bring the African-American community

into the mainstream.

Governments, businesses and colleges

have engaged in discrimination against white folks --

with affirmative action,

contract set-asides and quotas --

to advance black applicants over white applicants.

Churches, foundations, civic groups, schools

and individuals all over America

have donated their time and money to support

soup kitchens, adult education, day care,

retirement and nursing homes for blacks.
We hear the grievances.

Where is the gratitude??

Barack talks about new 'ladders of opportunity' for blacks.

Let him go to Altoona ?

And Johnstown ,

and ask the white kids in Catholic schools

how many were visited

lately by Ivy League recruiters handing out scholarships

for 'deserving' white kids...?

Is white America really responsible

for the fact that the crime and incarceration rates

for African-Americans are seven times those of white America ?

Is it really white America 's fault that illegitimacy

in the African-American community has hit 70 percent

and the black dropout rate from high schools

in some cities has reached 50 percent?

Is that the fault of white America or,

first and foremost,

a failure of the black community itself?

As for racism,

its ugliest manifestation is in interracial crime,

and especially interracial crimes of violence.

Is Barack Obama aware

that while

white criminals choose black victims 3 percent of the time,

black criminals choose white victims 45 percent of the time?

Is Barack aware

that black-on-white rapes are 100 times

more common than the reverse,

that black-on-white robberies

were 139 times as common

in the first three years of this decade

as the reverse?

We have all heard

ad nauseam from the Rev. Al about Tawana Brawley,

the Duke rape case and Jena .

And all turned out to be hoaxes.

But about the epidemic of black assaults

on whites that are real,

we hear nothing.

Sorry, Barack,

some of us have heard it all before,

about 40 years and 40 trillion tax dollars ago.

This needs to be passed around because,

this is a message everyone needs to hear!!! 

A New Statue for Dee Perez-Scott to Admire

Thomas Sowell - One of the Great Intellectduals of our Time

 

Dee Perez-Scott gets it Baxkwards -- Again!

Dee has become an advocate for the offspring of illegal aliens to permit them to join the armed forces.  I have been an advocate for a 4 year enlistment as a minimum qualification for eligibility under the DREAM Act.  College is not a substitute for service to our country as a form of redemption for the illegal acts of their parents.  Moreover, the parents of these children should never be allowed to a pathway to citizenship.  The ability to remain and work in this country would represent a major compromise on the part of those who would prefer to see them all systematically deported.  Citizenship is and should be unacceptable in any immigration bill.

Congress Threatens Personal Freedoms

 

As Barack Obama begins his second term in office, trust in the federal government remains mired near a historic low, while frustration with government remains high. And for the first time, a majority of the public says that the federal government threatens their personal rights and freedoms.
The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted Jan. 9-13 among 1,502 adults, finds that 53% think that the federal government threatens their own personal rights and freedoms while 43% disagree.
In March 2010, opinions were divided over whether the government represented a threat to personal freedom; 47% said it did while 50% disagreed. In surveys between 1995 and 2003, majorities rejected the idea that the government threatened people’s rights and freedoms.
The growing view that the federal government threatens personal rights and freedoms has been led by conservative Republicans. Currently 76% of conservative Republicans say that the federal government threatens their personal rights and freedoms and 54% describe the government as a “major” threat. Three years ago, 62% of conservative Republicans said the government was a threat to their freedom; 47% said it was a major threat.
By comparison, there has been little change in opinions among Democrats; 38% say the government poses a threat to personal rights and freedoms and just 16% view it as a major threat.
People who say they have guns in their households continue to be more likely than those who do not to say that the government is a threat to their personal rights and freedoms. About six-in-ten (62%) in gun-owning households see the government as a threat, compared with 45% of those without guns; this gap is no larger today than it was three years ago.
The survey finds continued widespread distrust in government. About a quarter of Americans (26%) trust the government in Washington to do the right thing just about always or most of the time; 73% say they can trust the government only some of the time or volunteer that they can never trust the government. Explore a Pew Research interactive on Public Trust in Government: 1958-2013.

I would argue that much of this  is due to the unAmerican influence of organisation's like La Razaand its members like Dee Perez-Scott who placea everything except La Raza in  distant second place.  Their lack loyalty to American  is obvious from all of their writings and positions.  When was the last time any of them thought about or questioned the effect of our rising population