Working for logical immigation reform based on a stable population, a recognition of the finite nature of our natural resources and the adverse impact of continued growth on our quality of life, standard of living, national interest, character, language, sovereignty and the rule of law. Pushing back and countering the disloyal elements in American society and the anti-American rhetoric of the leftwing illegal alien lobbies. In a debate, when your opponents turn to name calling, it's a good sign you've already won.
Thursday, January 31, 2013
Dee Perez-Scott gets it Baxkwards -- Again!
Dee has become an advocate for the offspring of illegal aliens to permit them to join the armed forces. I have been an advocate for a 4 year enlistment as a minimum qualification for eligibility under the DREAM Act. College is not a substitute for service to our country as a form of redemption for the illegal acts of their parents. Moreover, the parents of these children should never be allowed to a pathway to citizenship. The ability to remain and work in this country would represent a major compromise on the part of those who would prefer to see them all systematically deported. Citizenship is and should be unacceptable in any immigration bill.
Congress Threatens Personal Freedoms
As Barack Obama begins his second term in office, trust in the federal government remains mired near a historic low, while frustration with government remains high. And for the first time, a majority of the public says that the federal government threatens their personal rights and freedoms.
The latest national survey by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press, conducted Jan. 9-13 among 1,502 adults, finds that 53% think that the federal government threatens their own personal rights and freedoms while 43% disagree.In March 2010, opinions were divided over whether the government represented a threat to personal freedom; 47% said it did while 50% disagreed. In surveys between 1995 and 2003, majorities rejected the idea that the government threatened people’s rights and freedoms.
The growing view that the federal government threatens personal rights and freedoms has been led by conservative Republicans. Currently 76% of conservative Republicans say that the federal government threatens their personal rights and freedoms and 54% describe the government as a “major” threat. Three years ago, 62% of conservative Republicans said the government was a threat to their freedom; 47% said it was a major threat.
By comparison, there has been little change in opinions among Democrats; 38% say the government poses a threat to personal rights and freedoms and just 16% view it as a major threat.
People who say they have guns in their households continue to be more likely than those who do not to say that the government is a threat to their personal rights and freedoms. About six-in-ten (62%) in gun-owning households see the government as a threat, compared with 45% of those without guns; this gap is no larger today than it was three years ago.
The survey finds continued widespread distrust in government. About a quarter of Americans (26%) trust the government in Washington to do the right thing just about always or most of the time; 73% say they can trust the government only some of the time or volunteer that they can never trust the government. Explore a Pew Research interactive on Public Trust in Government: 1958-2013.
I would argue that much of this is due to the unAmerican influence of organisation's like La Razaand its members like Dee Perez-Scott who placea everything except La Raza in distant second place. Their lack loyalty to American is obvious from all of their writings and positions. When was the last time any of them thought about or questioned the effect of our rising population
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Dee Perez-Scott: The Limits of Immigration and Propagation
Even Dee Perez-Scott should appreciate the in-depth, multi-part series on global population growth in the Lost Angeles Times. The series, by Kenneth Weiss , touches briefly on U.S. population growth, which is the fastest in the developed world, and hints at immigration and migration factors. Hopefully, the series will cause some people to question why the United States sets such a poor example for the rest of the world by forcing U.S. population growth at a time when other countries are desperate to stabilize.
As most people know, it is rare for today's media to take a careful look at any kind of population issues. In particular, the media have failed in its duty to inform the public regularly and repeatedly on the causes, consequences and limits of population growth in America. As is article points out, there are limits to such finite natural resources as water, arable land and minerals and therefore the more people there are, the more poverty and hunger there will be. In the U.S., a declining standard of living, already in evidence, and a reduction in the quality of life will be among the results for the common people who cannot affluent to live in a gated communities or enjoy the other material things affluence can provide.
But there will be people like Dee who will turn a blind eye to this trend as long as they can avoid all but the imperceptible consequences of population growth driven by inane immigration and tax policies. They will not wake up until it is too late.
To read the full series see
Beyond 7 Billion
As most people know, it is rare for today's media to take a careful look at any kind of population issues. In particular, the media have failed in its duty to inform the public regularly and repeatedly on the causes, consequences and limits of population growth in America. As is article points out, there are limits to such finite natural resources as water, arable land and minerals and therefore the more people there are, the more poverty and hunger there will be. In the U.S., a declining standard of living, already in evidence, and a reduction in the quality of life will be among the results for the common people who cannot affluent to live in a gated communities or enjoy the other material things affluence can provide.
But there will be people like Dee who will turn a blind eye to this trend as long as they can avoid all but the imperceptible consequences of population growth driven by inane immigration and tax policies. They will not wake up until it is too late.
To read the full series see
Sunday, July 8, 2012
Dee Perez-Scott: Cosby speaks to you!
Dr.. William Henry 'Bill' Cosby, Jr., Ed..D.
+7.8.12.jpg)
Sunday, June 24, 2012
Dee Perez-Scott: Obama's Muslim Brotherhood Summer
The Muslim Brotherhood celebrates in Tahrir Square after their Islamist candidate, Mohammed Morsi, has been confirmed as the winner of the Egyptian presidential election. How many women can you count in this picture?
Th supporters of the military's choice said they did not want to see the Muslim Brotherhood come to power and impose their Islamic agenda. They say the talk is that the U.S. helped to empower the Muslim Brotherhood and that the Obama Administration has no idea how dangerous and radical the Muslim Brotherhood is. On the other hand, this may well be exactly what Obama wanted . The Arab Spring is turning into the Obama Muslim Brotherhood Summer.
One has to wonder why any women in Egypt voted for Morsi since they will sent to the back of the bus once he is sworn in. Who knows what the full range of restriction's on women will be? Will they be allowed to drive? Will they have to wear a bhurkas? Will their husbands be allowed to beat them as necessary? This would be an excellent place for Dsee Perez-Scott to learn a lesson she would never forget. Should we buy her a one way ticket to Egypt?
Th supporters of the military's choice said they did not want to see the Muslim Brotherhood come to power and impose their Islamic agenda. They say the talk is that the U.S. helped to empower the Muslim Brotherhood and that the Obama Administration has no idea how dangerous and radical the Muslim Brotherhood is. On the other hand, this may well be exactly what Obama wanted . The Arab Spring is turning into the Obama Muslim Brotherhood Summer.
One has to wonder why any women in Egypt voted for Morsi since they will sent to the back of the bus once he is sworn in. Who knows what the full range of restriction's on women will be? Will they be allowed to drive? Will they have to wear a bhurkas? Will their husbands be allowed to beat them as necessary? This would be an excellent place for Dsee Perez-Scott to learn a lesson she would never forget. Should we buy her a one way ticket to Egypt?
Saturday, June 23, 2012
Dee Perez-Scott: DREAM Amnesty
Dee Perez-Scott, as she calls herself on her un-American blog,
is a zealous supporter of all illegal aliens and the Administration which
continues to flaunt the law with selective enforcement. However, that name is
as phony as her blog photo. She
substituted the photo of a movie star for her own photo. She must be ashamed of her pudgy body. In her latest rant about the illegal DREAM amnesty
she says that Romney is pandering to the Hispanics but then insults Sarah Palin
because she said the same thing about Obama.
This is just another example of Perez-Scott’s confused thinking. Her rhetoric indicates that if Palin is nutty
then that makes Obama equally nutty.
Politicians always pander to voting blocs as a necessary
evil to getting elected. When we look at
the facts in this case, it is obvious that Obama’s action on DREAM was an overt
manifestation of his pandering to Hispanics.
Why else would he announce this new policy only a few months before the
election? He wants their votes, every one
of them, legal or illegal. The Congress
turned down the DREAM Act and Obama has the effrontery to ignore that fact and
proceed on this own. Obviously, he
believes in government by fiat – in a word dictatorship. First he ignores the laws he doesn’t like
then when the Congress says no, he ignores that and proceeds via executive
order. Obama says send me the DREAM bill
and I will sign it. Sorry Obama but that’s
not the way it works. You may propose
anything but Congress disposes.
Asked whether he would reverse the Obama DREAM amnesty executive
order, or whatever Obamae is calling it these days, Romney made a mistake in
not being more forthright on this issue.
He should have said, “Yes, I will rescind this order on the basis that
it is an illegal usurpation of the role of Congress. If the Congress sends me a bill that is fair
to legal immigrants and provides some form of relief for illegal aliens brought
to this country as young children by their parents, I will sign it. However,
I will insist that every DREAM applicant must have served in the Armed Forces
for not less than 4 years. During that
time they will be able to earn money to help them pay for a college
education. Hopefully, that experience will
deepen their love for this country, remove any stigma associated with their
illegal status, and mature them in a way that later will enable them to be more
successful in college.”
My own thoughts on this matter are in accord with the following paraphrase of a comment on another blog by a poster known only as v. He says that we need to keep in
mind that these illegals are not our children…they are Foreign Nationals born
to two illegal aliens….born using the US welfare system and still continuing to
suck up US taxpayer dollars! They refuse to speak English…even though we pay thousands
more to educate an illegal alien than we pay to educate a US citizen…they are
disruptive in class…are gang members…allow their children to tear up
merchandise in stores……. In no way are they an asset to the US! (end if my paraphrase of v's comment)They speak their native language as well as their parents and could be a real asset in their homelands. Their exposure to the American republic and its ideas might enable them to change the governments and economies in their homelands for the better. They have been parasites on the American economy for too long. It is time for them to give back by leaving forthwith to seek their fortunes in their homelands. If they are indeed among the best and the brightest of the illegals, that should not be a problem.
The problem or question that all Hispanics and others should ponder is: Will an America with 600 million people have the same standard of living and quality of life as an America with 300 million or less. Those who choose to put their heads in the sand will be responsible for recreating the very conditions that caused them or their parents to flee their homelands. This is what the pro-immigration propagandists are unlikely to mention.
v. continues, Rubio has shown that he represents the Interest of Foreign Nationals and Illegal Aliens….He has chosen to ignore what is in the best interest of legal US citizens! Most of us have been here for hundreds of years and we are being ignored! It’s time to take our country back…..No one has the right to enterr the US unless we invite them. Obama has no authority to do this in violation of immigration laws. And it’s Time to remove the welcome mat! We have allowed too many Foreign Nationals into the US in too short a time. Approximately 7 Million since Obama took Office…they took my job and my friends next it will be yours or your Childs JOB!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

